2008
Legislative Wrap Up
Once
again, 1000 Friends of Florida played an active role during the legislative
session. Thank you for your calls and emails to key legislators. Your
support made a difference in helping to secure the passage of positive
legislation to fund and continue Florida Forever, and halt damaging
provisions, such as those included in bills related to aggregate mining.
However, much remains to be done in 2009 to address growth management
and other key issues. Here is a brief overview of what did and did
not pass:
Neither
the House (HB 7201) nor Senate (SB 474) growth management legislation
passed. The Senate was close to passing legislation supported by 1000
Friends of Florida. But on second reading, several controversial amendments
appeared and, in keeping them off the Senate bill, SB 474 ultimately
never made it to the third and final reading. "Lost" items
included additional neighborhood meetings for map amendments, the
five-day "cooling off period" for changes to amendments
before hearings, the supermajority vote requirement for plan amendments,
the limitation on plan amendments to one cycle per year, elimination
of many exemptions to the twice per year plan amendment cycles, prohibition
of LPAs in communities of 10,000 or more from being the same as the
elected body, improvements to the Coastal High Hazard Area (CHHA)
definition, strengthened requirements for the optional development
allowance within CHHAs, and the optional rural sub-element.
Some
pieces of the House growth management legislation were offloaded onto
SB 682 as you will see below. In addition, below are summaries of
several bills that were of interest, many of which did not pass. Thanks
to DCA and the SFWMD for sharing their information summaries with
us. The "big" legislation that did pass was the 10 year,
$3 billion successor to the Florida Forever program, $50 million for
Everglades restoration, and the energy bill.
Legislation
That Passed
Developments
of Regional Impact (SB
1706) - This bill by Senator Margolis had several DRI waivers
that included an addition/clarification of DRI extension for all related
local government approvals including, but not limited to, agreements,
certificates, and permits. The extension also includes any development
order that was adopted between January 1, 2006 and July 1, 2007. Also
included are DRI exemptions for any development within a county having
a population greater than 1.25 million which is proposed for at least
two uses, one of which is for use as an office or laboratory appropriate
for the research and development of medical technology, biotechnology,
or life science applications, is exempt from this section if:
1. The
land is located in a designated urban infill area or within 5 miles
of a state-supported biotechnical research facility or if a local
government having jurisdiction recognizes, by resolution, that the
land is located in a compact, high-intensity, and high-density multiuse
area that is appropriate for intensive growth.
2. The land is located within three-fourths of 1 mile from one or
more bus or light rail transit stops.
3. The development is registered with the United States Green Building
Council and there is intent to apply for certification of each building
under the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design rating program,
or the development is registered by an alternate green building rating
system that a local government having jurisdiction finds appropriate,
by resolution.
Transportation
(SB
682) - On the last day of the session, language added by Rep.
Cannon to this bill deals with the compatibility of lands adjacent
to airports which requires an update of appropriate local future land
use maps by June 20, 2011. A DRI exemption was added for "port
related activities" within 3 miles of a port. DCA and the affected
local government have to determine if the development is "port
related". A further clarification on backlog language from last
year was added further confirming that new development is not responsible
for fixing backlogged facilities. Finally, FDOT was directed to develop
a methodology by March 2009, that shows how DRIs can achieve a greater
than 30 percent internal trip capture. This same legislation, among
other things, authorizes the use of hybrid vehicles, regardless of
the number of passengers, in HOV lanes.
Energy
(HB
7135) - This legislation was a priority for the Governor.
Among other provisions, it implements the Governor's executive orders
from last year related to reduction targets for greenhouse gas emissions
and the development of a regulatory rule to cap electric utility greenhouse
gas emissions. There is also a requirement included for gasoline sold
in Florida to contain ten percent ethanol by 2011. The Senate companion,
SB 1544, contained a good amendment from Senator Constantine that
called for all local and state government plans to address green house
gas emission and VMT reductions. Unfortunately this provision dropped
out when the House took up the Senate bill.
Florida
Forever (SB
542) -- The Florida Forever program will continue for another
ten years with the passage of legislation this Session. The legislation
moves the program forward and, in addition to establishing a funding
mechanism for working waterfronts and a number of other provisions,
the legislation also redirects 5 percent of the 35 percent that water
managements receive in funding to the Department of Agriculture and
Consumer Services (DACS) and Florida Communities Trust (FCT). Three-and-one-half
percent is directed to DACS (about $15 million) for rural and family
easements, and one- and-one-half percent is directed to FCT for working
waterfronts. For more information, please visit Florida
Forever.
Legislation
That Did Not Pass
Aggregate
Mining (SB 774/SB 2406) -- Two bills related to aggregate mining died
in the Senate Environmental Preservation and Conservation Committee.
The concern with regard to these bills was the preemption of local
government authority. These bills would have prohibited local governments
from enacting or enforcing ordinances, resolutions, rules, regulations,
policies or other actions that would prohibit limestone mining in
certain lands that are zoned for mining. The legislation would have
required a super-majority vote of the local government to deny any
application for construction aggregate materials mining site approval
if the applicant has received the appropriate approvals from the pertinent
state agencies. There were also numerous provisions included from
the Strategic Aggregates Review Task Force, including the establishment
of the Strategic Aggregate Resource Assessment (SARA) which would
have addressed the demand, location and relevant regulatory framework
for construction aggregate materials, and the necessary infrastructure
aspects for such materials.
There
was an amendment to extend the life of the Strategic Aggregates Task
Force to June 2009. This amendment was adopted onto Senate Bill 682,
a transportation bill that did pass.
Desalination
Technology (SB 708/HB 199) -- The bill would have required a study
to examine all current and available desalination technologies, recognizing
the need for alternative water supplies and long-term water sustainability
and that desalination is one of those alternatives. DEP, in coordination
with the water management districts, would have been required to issue
a report on the current state of desalination and recommendations
for a plan to implement desalination technology. The House version
of the bill incorporated two amendments, the first that authorized
the District to issue up to 50-year water use permits for certain
alternative water supply projects that involve partnerships with private
landowners. The other amendment addressed Florida-Friendly Landscaping,
removed the word "Xeriscape" from the statute and replaced
it with "Florida-Friendly Landscaping." The amendment further
recognized that the use of Florida-Friendly landscaping and other
measures that conserve Florida's water resources serves a compelling
public interest and that the participation of homeowners' associations
and local governments is essential to state water conservation efforts.
The House bill passed unanimously but died in Senate messages. The
original version of the bill (without the added amendments) was amended
onto the water management district sunset bill (HB 7143) on the last
day of session but that bill also did not pass (see below).
Expedited
Permitting (SB 402/HB 147) - This would have required the Department
of Environmental Protection and the water management districts to
adopt programs to expedite the processing of wetland resource and
environmental resource permits for certain economic development projects,
died in Senate messages after being passed by the House. The legislation
would have required approval or denial within 45 days after receipt
of the original application, the last submittal of requested information
or at the written request of the permit applicant. The District would
have preferred that the legislation require approval or denial within
a certain timeframe after receipt of a "completed" application
and will work with the sponsors during the interim on that end. Senator
Fasano filed an amendment to the growth management package to include
the expedited permitting bill, but withdrew the amendment before it
was debated. The growth management bill also did not pass.
"Florida
Friendly" Fertilizer Ordinance (HB 1267/SB 2352) -- This legislation
attempted to implement some of the recommendations of the Consumer
Fertilizer Task Force, and directed the Department of Environmental
Protection (DEP) to adopt the "Florida Friendly Fertilizer Use
on Urban Landscapes" Model Ordinance 2 by October 1, 2008. Local
governments that have adopted and implemented the model ordinance
and could demonstrate that the model ordinance is not sufficiently
protective may adopt additional or more stringent provisions to the
model ordinance. The legislation exempted from the adoption requirement
for the model ordinance a county or municipal government that adopts
its own fertilizer use ordinance prior to July 1, 2008. The House
bill died in the Policy and Budget Council and the Senate bill died
in Community Affairs.
Rural
Land Stewardship (SB 2602/HB 7151) -- The Rural Land Stewardship legislation
added land used for water storage, alternative water supply or water
quality enhancement to the list of lands that receive the highest
number of transferable rural land use credits. It would have increased
incentives available for owners who establish alternative water resource
development projects within rural land stewardship areas and give
priority funding under the Water Protection and Sustainability Program.
It would also have provided a preference for a water use permit under
s. 373.233, F.S. The Senate bill died in the Committee on Community
Affairs and the House bill was heard in a workshop setting but not
formally in committee.
On a
side note, the Department of Community Affairs is currently in rulemaking
on the Rural Land Stewardship Program and will hopefully complete
that rulemaking in the near future.
Springs
Protection Act & Task Force (HB 31/SB 2394 - SB 2078) -- The Florida
Springs Stewardship Task Force would have created a task force to
collect and inventory all existing data and to identify zones of influence
for each of Florida's first magnitude springs. It would also required
the identification and listing of best management practices (BMPs)
for land uses in the ones of influence and identify existing and potential
sources of funding for implementing the BMPs. This bill died in the
Policy & Budget Council. The "Florida Springs Protection
Act" would have created a pilot program for the delineation of
the springsheds for Silver Springs and Rainbow Springs in Marion County.
As part of the pilot program, the Department of Environmental Protection
would adopt spring protection zones and propose total maximum daily
loads and basin management action plans for the delineated springsheds.
This bill incorporated language in two other springs bills related
to the creation of a task force. Both Senate bills died in General
Government Appropriations.
Stormwater/Homeowners
Associations (SB 2284/HB 1153) -- Legislation requiring that prior
to the dedication of stormwater management systems to homeowners'
associations, the water management district or the Department of Environmental
Protection (DEP) shall inspect such systems to ensure compliance with
all applicable laws died in the Senate Community Affairs Committee.
The bill had been amended to address concerns about impacts to water
management districts and DEP associated with completing and maintaining
stormwater systems that are abandoned by a homeowner's association
that has dissolved or is no longer in operation. The amendment put
the burden for the stormwater management system on the applicant and
gave the permittee a clear path of responsibility. It also provided
for financial responsibility to ensure that a stormwater management
system is complete and is in compliance prior to transferring it to
another entity.
Water
Management District Sunset (SB 1296/HB 7143) -- The Water Management
District Sunset legislation came up on the final day of the Session
and a strike-all amendment was added to replace the original bill.
Earlier versions of the legislation included language that re-enacted
the water management districts, deleted the Oklawaha River Basin Advisory
Council, and changed the licensure requirements for water well contractors.
The legislation would also have required water management districts
to include "appropriate substantive committee" chairs in
the distribution list for tentative budget submission and provided
that governing board, basin board, committees or advisory boards may
conduct meetings by means of communication media technology.
The bills
also would have authorized the Legislature to annually review the
millage rate for each district and annually set the maximum amount
of revenue authorized to be raised by each district and changed the
water management districts' fiscal year to July 1 through June 30
to match the state fiscal year. The House bill included a provision
to nominate members of the water management district Governing Boards
with the Governor selecting from the list of nominees and the Senate
still confirming the members. A strike-all amendment was adopted in
the House that deleted all of the above-referenced subjects with the
exception of the water well licensure requirements. The amendment
added the desalination technology language (the substance of HB 199)
and the District was successful in also including the WRAP language
(SB2580) onto the amendment. The bill passed the House unanimously
but unfortunately was not heard in the Senate before adjournment.
Legislation last year extended the sunset date to 2009 so the Legislature
will have another opportunity to look at this next year.
West-Central
Florida Water Restoration Action Plan (WRAP) (SB 2580/HB 1415) --The
District's West-Central Florida Water Restoration Action Plan was
not only a budget initiative but legislation designed to enhance the
visibility and long-term viability of the program by incorporating
the program into statute. The bill provided intent language that recognized
the resource concerns in the Southern Water Use Caution Area (SWUCA)
and outlined the components of the plan that will assist in meeting
the goals of the SWUCA Recovery Strategy. The legislation also required
the District to annually report on the progress of the program. The
Senate passed the WRAP unanimously and made it on the calendar in
the House, however the bill was not heard before Session adjourned.
As mentioned above, WRAP language was added to the water management
district sunset bill which did pass the House but not the Senate before
adjournment. The bill sponsors, Representative Mike Grant and Senator
J.D. Alexander were very supportive and worked the bill hard during
the last days, and we are hopeful they will file the bill again next
year.